InSite Use Cases

Before purchase, buyers need to know whether InSite can support the way their teams inspect, review, and deliver work. The strongest fit is a team that already captures drone evidence and wants better review, traceability, and report production.

• Compare RGB, thermal, orthophoto, and point cloud evidence in one mission record.
• Reduce repeated site visits by improving remote evidence review.
• Standardize findings, severities, categories, and report structure.
• Track mission readiness and processing status instead of chasing folders.

Inspection teams use InSite to upload mission evidence, reconcile paired captures, inspect visual and thermal data, create findings, and escalate only the issues that matter. The system supports both quick triage and deeper engineering review.

• Pair RGB and thermal images for the same asset face or target.
• Use image tools for annotations, notes, thermal readings, and measurements.
• Apply finding taxonomy so categories and severities stay consistent.
• Use quality gates and expert settings when measurement confidence matters.

Orthophoto and map workflows give teams a site-level view. They are useful when findings depend on access, distance, ground condition, elevation difference, surrounding equipment, or vegetation context.

Engineering reviewers use metadata, measurements, 3D scenes, and expert controls to understand what the evidence can and cannot support. The important distinction is that InSite exposes the assumptions behind measurements instead of treating every click as equally reliable.

Reports are built from mission findings and evidence captures. This avoids the common problem where report screenshots drift away from the original evidence, reviewer notes, and finding state.